Dr. Tom Sunic Joins A3P Board of Directors
Speaking to a large audience during his travels to Southern California, Tom Sunic, former professor and Croatian diplomat, announced his having joined the directorate of the American Third Position. The move followed a private meeting held between Chairman Bill Johnson, Director Kevin MacDonald, and other party leaders, where Dr. Sunic was introduced to the mission and strategy of the American Third Position. Always endeavoring to help his fellow countrymen, Tom Sunic did not hesitate to join the ranks of the directorate.
Before giving lecture as to the state of Nationalist political movements in Europe, Dr. Sunic offered a few words to mark the occasion. “I’d like to thank my friends and future comrades. I am here of service.” Short on ceremony and focused on the subject at hand, Dr. Sunic proceeded to brief the audience on the political climate in Europe. He cautioned the audience against viewing the political climate there as something wholly unique to Europe, and he pointed out that American Nationalists had many advantages over their European counterparts. As evidence, he pointed to the fact that America has a massive population of Europeans living within its borders, that there exists a history of cohesiveness amongst these peoples, and that we still have a great many freedoms, as compared to the former, communist Yugoslavia.
Having himself lived through the tyrannical reign of a communist dictatorship, Dr. Sunic also stressed that our fight is not as bad as it may seem. Despite the image of itself the establishment is able to project, it is not all-powerful, and it’s ability to maintain control can quickly evaporate before a people with the will to win.
“The very same people… who were communists, arch communists, became over night, literally, in one week… they became arch Nationalists”, said Dr. Sunic, recounting the downfall of the communist government in Yugoslavia. “The very same people you may now find distrustful….may flock to our rank and file”, he continued.
His optimism and words of encouragement were received with roaring applause. Still not quite finished, however, he made an appeal to all those in attendance to become members of the American Third Position.
It is with great pleasure that we welcome Dr. Tom Sunic to the Board of the American Third Position. His unique experiences in Europe, his expertise in language and in literature, his intimate knowledge of Nationalist politics, and his incredible ability to inspire to action all those he comes into contact with will be of tremendous benefit to the party.
Category: American Voice
Loading IntenseDebate Comments...
I have seen this Ruslan Amirkhanov character before. He hangs around the SPLC website, defending the PC garbage that they spew.
Folks here have made some very intelligent responses to him. This one especially caught my eye:
"But understand, White Supremacism and hatred is the direct result of the social and political inability for White people to express and organize explicitly as White people – when many other groups are not only supported in doing such, but encouraged to do so. I can assure you, claiming White people "do not exist" will only foster more tension, more hatred, and more irrationality.
If you truly want to purge the hate from large sections of the White Nationalist community, do it the right way. Acknowledge grievances, champion the moderates, and offer solutions to those grievances. Choose to continue to demonize and fear-monger and the extremists will grow in number because you would have created them."
The only thing I would say to this is that the Ruslans of this country, the organizations such as the SPLC that they swarm around, and the politicoeconomic system that we live under which supports such organizations, are not willing to compromise, nor "champion the moderates", any more than the Soviet Union was willing to compromise with or "champion the moderates" of the various nationalist movements that existed in it during its 74-year history.
Systems like the Soviet Union, Soviet ideologues, systems like the one we live under, and the ideologues that defend this system are never willing to bend, but they always break in the end.
That is why I do not believe that things will get better for European-Americans because this system "makes it better for us", or even by a political party such as American Third Position coming to power. I believe what will happen is the system will simply break in the end, just as the USSR did, and for the same reasons, i.e. a consistently underperforming economy combined with costly wars abroad. And that things will get better for us after that happens.
Ruslan asks: "Can you detail what these supposed inherent abilities are, and document them with scientific proof? Same with the "inherent needs"?"
So I ask Ruslan:
Would you ask these questions of blacks or Asians or do you feel that it is only "Whites" that must document their uniqueness to provide legitimacy for their being? Are you mocking us? Are you a racist, then?
Next up should be Mark Steyn. He has extremely similar instincts as Sunic, but has much more fans and followers in America.
Mark Steyn is an ardent Zionist. His ilk have caused the country to be bled dry fighting wars for Israel halfway around the world. No, thanks. The day interlopers like Steyn are welcomed will be the beginning of the end for the A3P.
Scott wrote:·
>If you truly want to purge the hate from large sections of the White Nationalist community, do it the right way. Acknowledge grievances, champion the moderates, and offer solutions to those grievances. Choose to continue to demonize and fear-monger and the extremists will grow in number because you would have created them.
Absolutely correct. Everywhere, Whites are beginning to feel like they are under siege and when people feel this way, they become angry and radicalized. So back off lefties! You are creating a monster!
The thing I have never been able to comprehend, is why the left feels the need to impose their views on everyone else. Just because I like a particular flavor of ice cream, doesn't mean I want to force everyone else to eat it.
I am also starting to think that the only solution to this never ending left/right civil war between Whites, is for there to be an amicable divorce. The sooner it occurs, the better it will be for all parties.
Bravo Scott, very well done indeed, touche!
"…his specific targeting of White identity should be correctly seen as an attempt to deny another group of people the moral right to freely associate and identify with a particular set of standards be they genetic, cultural, religious, or all of the above."
Absolutely, Scott. It's our prerogative to identify ourselves as we choose, social construct or not.
You'd think Dr. Ignatiev would go to similar pains to condemn "blackness" as a social construct (which it is, but that doesn't make it inauthentic). The election of Obama was viewed as justice for blacks whose ancestors suffered under slavery in America. Yet Obama's ancestors were not slaves in America; his father was a native Kenyan. So why is electing Obama considered to be a victory for the descendants of slaves? Because Obama is BLACK.
Blacks are encouraged by the media and education elites to identify with their "blackness." And in fact, descendants of slaves from Sierra Leone 400 years ago have similarities in culture and appearance to native Kenyans.
Who calls to "abolish the black race?" Not anyone in the A3P.
We "White Americans" have similarities because of our shared European heritage, the same way everyone with African heritage is "Black."
You can call that a social construct or not, but the fact is when two White people mate, the product is a White baby. When a White mates with a non-white, the result is a non-white baby. Social construct or not, the only way to "abolish the white race" is to make Whites stop having babies with each other. And the elites in media and education are making one hell of an effort to do that.
To Ruslan:
Why do I have to define what I mean by 'White?' We know who and what we are, and all we have to do is come together within the clearly defined politicoeconomic agenda of a set of self-motivated social movements. We are not here to define or justify our Race to anyone outside or opposed to our cause. We will define ourselves to each other, and when we have sufficient mutual understanding of our cause and methodologies, we will then begin the task of amassing against all those things which are antiWhite.
As for our inherent abilities and needs, we don't feel at this point that a succinct definition or explanation of such to anyone not of our own is in our best current interests.
Thank you for the comments
I disagree Ruslan Amirkhanov.
As I see it, "White privilege" is a baseless neo-Marxian social theory devised to aide in dismantling unique peoples into individual consumer units, specifically Western-European societies. As the theory goes, you can't kill off what never existed in the first place – an idea that should be appalling to most decent human beings. Besides, you can not have it both ways, you can not claim "Whiteness" as a vague and undefinable term, yet all the while claim "Whiteness" as completely definable in relation to "White Privilege".
Ignatiev, if he were to remain ethically and intellectually consistent, would be wise to target all forms of ethnic/racial identification, including that of his own (ethno-religious) Jewish heritage. Otherwise, his specific targeting of White identity should be correctly seen as an attempt to deny another group of people the moral right to freely associate and identify with a particular set of standards be they genetic, cultural, religious, or all of the above.
I would agree that White Supremacy is a non-starter and is an intellectual death for anyone that tries to advocate in favor of it. However, I do have a problem with society, mainly the media, throwing around such labels with any accounting for accuracy. I am a racialist, I believe in European/White survival both on the genetic and cultural level. Am I therefore making an objective value judgment on other peoples? Not really. I'm certainly prioritizing the European people(s), but that isn't on any objective/finite reality, rather my relation and association to these people I identify with.
I would agree with you that disparaging people solely on the basis on their ethnic background is morally wrong and strategically stupid. I think we should be able to talk about the sobering realities of "multiculturalism" in modern day American, but we can do so with a higher level of candor and discourse. All peoples have their great moments, and their less-that-great moments, to say the least. Its in a people's nature to focus on the good at the exclusion of the bad. I'm really not into the "my dad can beat up your dad" level of discourse.
But understand, White Supremacism and hatred is the direct result of the social and political inability for White people to express and organize explicitly as White people – when many other groups are not only supported in doing such, but encouraged to do so. I can assure you, claiming White people "do not exist" will only foster more tension, more hatred, and more irrationality.
If you truly want to purge the hate from large sections of the White Nationalist community, do it the right way. Acknowledge grievances, champion the moderates, and offer solutions to those grievances. Choose to continue to demonize and fear-monger and the extremists will grow in number because you would have created them.
Dave, you might be happy to know that Professor Ignatiev, Jewish heritage notwithstanding, considers himself to be white and acknowledges how he benefits from white privilege. He correctly believes that "white" is not some actual ethnic group but a social construct, and it is that social construct he is out to destroy. This is very clear from his writings. The term white, largely an American term, paves over the heritage and history of many different European ethnicities, and inspires working class people to identify with their exploiters, most of whom are white.
As for White Supremacist, this term is used because when you go on any racialist forum or attend any such meetings, you are inevitably going to hear other cultures and ethnicities being run-down(which is of course the fault of their genes, according to racialists), and European culture being glorified(while heavily distorted as well). But let me play devil's advocate here: You speak about "inherent abilities" of "White" people. Can you detail what these supposed inherent abilities are, and document them with scientific proof? Same with the "inherent needs".
“The goal of abolishing the white [sic] race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white [sic] supremacists.”
— Noel Ignatiev, history professor at the Massachusetts College of Art, Harvard Magazine, Sep-Oct 2002
I want to bring attention to one of the most perjorative terms in use today against our people: White Supremicist.
This term won't go away until we make it go away. Whenever I hear someone use that stupid term I always reply by saying: "We are White Actualists…we want to actualize our inherent abilities, attributes, and principles of living to actualize a society for ourselves that is consistent with our inherent needs."
It works…I hope you all start to utilize this strategy.
We need a guy like this. I really hope he contributes some of his commentary to this site.
A fantastic edition to the party. Dr. Sunic is a brilliant man. BRAVO!